Ahead of Print: Cognard Type V Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Shunt

Screen Shot 2013-07-30 at 2.24.07 PMBackground and Importance: To make prompt diagnosis of intracranial dural arteriovenous shunt (DAVS) with spinal venous drainage, classified as Cognard type V, is difficult. The authors investigated the angiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of Cognard type V DAVS to determine the reason for difficulty in early diagnosis.

Clinical Presentation: The authors systematically reviewed 54 published and 3 new cases of Cognard type V DAVS. The pattern of venous drainage was classified on the basis of relative dominance of the anterior and posterior spinal veins using angiograms. T2-weighted sagittal MRIs were used to detect signal flow voids of enlarged spinal veins. Types of venous drainage were determined in 49 of the 57 cases. Twenty-eight and 8 cases showed a dominance of anterior and posterior spinal venous drainage, respectively. In 13 cases, venous drainage was equally distributed through the anterior and posterior spinal veins. Among 41 cases with an abnormally dilated anterior spinal vein, MR images were available for 25 cases. Signal flow voids of enlarged anterior spinal veins were detected in 9 (36.0%) cases, whereas dilatation of the posterior spinal veins was apparent in 9 of 16 cases (56.3%). Overall, MRI detected enlargement of either anterior or posterior spinal veins in 15 of 41 cases (36.6%).

Conclusion: In Cognard type V DAVS, anterior venous drainage is dominant. Since the anterior spinal veins are located subpially, flow voids are less prominent on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. This may lead to difficulties in diagnosing. Evaluation using MR angiography may compensate for these limitations.

From: Cognard Type V Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Shunt: Case Reports and Literature Review With Special Consideration to the Pattern of Spinal Venous Drainage by Haryu et al.

Full article access for Neurosurgery subscribers at Neurosurgery-Online.com.